Macalvins have been running the Payroll and Pension Plan for Hayes & Yeading United Football Club for over 10 years.… Read more
Bernard Bitmead
Our forensic accounting team brings the investigative rigour, technical depth and clarity of communication that this category of work demands.
Three principles define our forensic work:
Methodology is set with the forum and the standard of evidence in mind. Working papers are maintained to a standard that withstands disclosure, cross-examination or regulatory inspection.
Reports and oral evidence are written and given for judges, arbitrators, audit committees and counsel rather than for fellow accountants.
Where the role is that of an expert witness, the independence is real. The opinion we give is the opinion the evidence supports it does not bend to the instructing party’s preference.
They want experienced forensic accountants whose work, opinion and testimony will survive contact with the other side.
With our team, you get precision, continuity and the kind of considered advice that comes from people who know your numbers as well as you do.
As a Top 100 UK accountancy firm with international reach through PrimeGlobal, Macalvins brings that depth of expertise to every client, at every stage of growth.
Speak to our teamYes. Several of our forensic team are experienced expert witnesses under CPR Part 35 and the equivalent procedural rules in other forums. We have given expert evidence in commercial disputes, shareholder actions, partnership disputes, matrimonial financial proceedings and criminal cases. The duties owed to the court are carried with the seriousness they require.
Carefully. The first hours of an internal investigation often shape its eventual outcome. We will work with you and your legal counsel to define the scope, preserve evidence, conduct interviews with appropriate protocol and report on findings to whatever standard (regulatory, litigation, employment) the situation will eventually be tested against.
An audit provides reasonable assurance over financial statements on a sampling basis, with the objective of a regulatory opinion. Forensic work is investigative — directed at specific allegations, transactions or scenarios — and produces evidence designed to be tested in a contested forum. The two disciplines share underlying skills but the methodology, evidential standards and output are different.